Senator Bernie Sanders has condemned the decision to remove CDC chief Susan Monarez, calling it a profound mistake at a delicate moment for public health. Beyond the political back-and-forth, the episode forces a larger question: what happens to health security when leadership churn collides with an already stressed workforce, contested science, and rising misinformation? For supporters of the dismissal, change promises accountability and a sharper focus on performance. For critics, sidelining CDC chief Susan Monarez risks compounding operational strain, weakening continuity, and signaling to career scientists that their work can be upended by political crosswinds.

Sanders’ response and why it resonated — CDC chief Susan Monarez

Sanders’ critique landed because it framed the removal as more than a personnel fight. He tied it to the system’s capacity to respond to outbreaks, rebuild vaccination confidence, and repair data pipelines that faltered during the pandemic. In that framing, the ouster of CDC chief Susan Monarez is not just about who holds the title; it is about whether hard-won reforms—rapid genomic surveillance, real-time dashboards, and better state–federal data sharing—keep moving without interruption. The senator’s argument echoes a broader concern among public health advocates: abrupt leadership changes tend to slow procurement, delay guidance updates, and divert scarce staff time into transition briefings and organizational politics.

What the dismissal signals for public health governance

Public health depends on stable, technically credible leadership that can outlast news cycles. When a top official leaves suddenly, program directors re-prioritize, interagency partners pause, and external collaborators—from state health departments to global NGOs—wait to see if policy will shift. If the departure of CDC chief Susan Monarez is perceived as political rather than performance-based, partners may hedge further, protecting their own institutions from whiplash by delaying joint projects or data integrations. That caution can be rational, but the cumulative effect is friction exactly where the system needs fluidity.

Continuity vs. course correction

There are legitimate debates about how the agency should modernize: streamline guidance, clarify risk thresholds, simplify messaging, and ship data faster. Leadership change can be a lever for reform. Yet even good-faith course corrections carry transition costs—rebaselining strategies, rewriting program charters, refreshing legal reviews, and resetting vendor contracts. If the departure of CDC chief Susan Monarez coincides with major initiatives—respiratory-virus dashboards before winter, vector-borne threat mapping before summer, or antimicrobial-resistance pilots—it increases the likelihood of missed windows. Public health rarely gets second chances at timing.

Politicization risks and agency morale

Scientists accept scrutiny, but not instability. Recurrent removals and headline-driven pressure teach risk-averse behaviors: fewer bold pilot projects, more hedged recommendations, and slower publication of controversial findings. If staff read the ouster of CDC chief Susan Monarez as a warning shot, morale can slump, recruitment stalls, and mid-career experts eye the exits for academia or industry. That erosion is hard to reverse; training a field epidemiologist or surveillance modeler takes years, not weeks. The loss is not only talent, but also the trust networks those professionals build with state and tribal partners.

Operational consequences you can see—and those you can’t

Some consequences are visible: delayed advisories, paused guidance, and postponed briefings to governors or school systems. Others are harder to spot but equally important. Procurement officers may slow purchase orders for lab reagents until priorities are reconfirmed. Data-use agreements awaiting signature may sit in legal review during a leadership reset. A working group linking wastewater surveillance to hospital surge planning might miss a seasonal wave because it needed top-level clearance to expand. Each example is small, but together they illustrate why changing CDC chief Susan Monarez mid-stream can ripple through operations in ways the public never sees.

Communication, trust, and the risk of mixed signals

Health communication is a chain: evidence, interpretation, message design, messengers, and delivery. If leadership changes, the chain can kink. States need to know whether the risk framework they used last season still applies; clinicians want to understand whether testing or treatment algorithms have shifted; school leaders need clarity about ventilation and vaccination guidance. If the removal of CDC chief Susan Monarez prompts re-litigation of settled language or rebranding of campaigns, messages fracture across jurisdictions. In a polarized environment, inconsistent voice is costly—people fill gaps with rumor or partisan cues, and once confidence dips, it is hard to claw back.

Global coordination and America’s credibility

The CDC is not just a domestic agency; it is a global node. It trains epidemiologists abroad, supports labs in low-resource settings, and collaborates with WHO and partner ministries. International partners watch U.S. leadership signals carefully. If the exit of CDC chief Susan Monarez reads as instability, counterparts may delay joint field investigations, scale back data-sharing, or re-route funding streams. Those hesitations undermine outbreak detection timelines that depend on fast, cross-border information flows—precisely the capacity gaps the world has been trying to close since COVID-19.

Oversight, accountability, and what would make the system better

Critics of the agency are not wrong to demand faster, clearer outputs. Oversight can help. Congressional committees and inspectors general can push for outcome metrics tied to readiness: turnaround times for variant detection, days from signal to public advisory, and speed of guidance updates. They can also fund the unglamorous plumbing—modern data standards, interstate compacts, and commercial data licenses—that makes actionable dashboards possible. But oversight works best when it enhances continuity rather than destabilizes it. If the process that removed CDC chief Susan Monarez did not come with a transparent transition plan and a published set of performance benchmarks, it risks looking like politics first, reform second.

What a constructive transition would include

Even if leadership change is deemed necessary, a better process is available. First, publish a 90-day continuity plan listing critical deliverables that will not slip—seasonal respiratory guidance, updated vaccine effectiveness summaries, and school and workplace ventilation updates. Second, name an empowered acting leader with technical credibility and relationships across states. Third, protect key initiatives from churn by ring-fencing their budgets and teams. Fourth, maintain a single public risk framework across respiratory, vector-borne, and emerging pathogens so states are not forced to translate shifting terminologies. If the exit of CDC chief Susan Monarez were paired with these guardrails, the system could keep momentum while leadership changes.

How to judge competing claims

For readers trying to sort the politics from the policy, three filters help. Ask whether the stated rationale is about measurable performance or about individual disagreements on messaging tone; whether changes are paired with continuity guarantees for near-term deliverables; and whether the process included state, tribal, territorial, and local input. If those boxes are checked, leadership change can be part of healthy governance. If not, the cost of removing CDC chief Susan Monarez is likely to show up as operational drag precisely when speed matters.

What to watch next

In the weeks ahead, watch for four signals. First, staffing: do key program leads stay or depart? Second, cadence: do weekly respiratory and outbreak updates hit deadlines, and do they speak with one voice? Third, partnerships: do states report smoother data flows or new fragmentation? Fourth, procurement: are labs and surveillance projects getting what they need on time? If these indicators hold steady, the damage may be limited. If they wobble, the decision to push out CDC chief Susan Monarez will look less like reform and more like avoidable turbulence.

Bottom line

Public health leadership should be judged on outputs people can feel—clear risk communication, reliable data, timely guidance, and effective field support. Rapid change without guardrails imperils those outputs. Whatever one’s politics, the stakes are simple: outbreaks don’t wait, and credibility is perishable. If the process that removed CDC chief Susan Monarez failed to preserve continuity, the country will pay in slower responses and thinner trust. If, instead, oversight and transition planning are used to lock in reforms and protect near-term priorities, the agency can keep moving and earn confidence the hard way—by delivering, week after week, when it counts.

Further Read

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — About CDC and leadership structure: https://www.cdc.gov/

• Congressional Research Service — The CDC’s authorities and organization: https://crsreports.congress.gov/

• Government Accountability Office — Public health preparedness and CDC management reviews: https://www.gao.gov/

• National Academies — Strategies for building public trust in health communication: https://www.nationalacademies.org/

• BMJ — Analyses on political interference and public health decision-making: https://www.bmj.com/

• Senator Bernie Sanders — Official statements and press releases: https://www.sanders.senate.gov/

Connect with the Author

Curious about the inspiration behind The Unmaking of America or want to follow the latest news and insights from J.T. Mercer? Dive deeper and stay connected through the links below—then explore Vera2 for sharp, timely reporting.

About the Author

Discover more about J.T. Mercer’s background, writing journey, and the real-world events that inspired The Unmaking of America. Learn what drives the storytelling and how this trilogy came to life.
[Learn more about J.T. Mercer]

NRP Dispatch Blog

Stay informed with the NRP Dispatch blog, where you’ll find author updates, behind-the-scenes commentary, and thought-provoking articles on current events, democracy, and the writing process.
[Read the NRP Dispatch]

Vera2 — News & Analysis 

Looking for the latest reporting, explainers, and investigative pieces? Visit Vera2, North River Publications’ news and analysis hub. Vera2 covers politics, civil society, global affairs, courts, technology, and more—curated with context and built for readers who want clarity over noise.
[Explore Vera2] 

Whether you’re interested in the creative process, want to engage with fellow readers, or simply want the latest updates, these resources are the best way to stay in touch with the world of The Unmaking of America—and with the broader news ecosystem at Vera2.

Free Chapter

Begin reading The Unmaking of America today and experience a story that asks: What remains when the rules are gone, and who will stand up when it matters most? Join the Fall of America mailing list below to receive the first chapter of The Unmaking of America for free and stay connected for updates, bonus material, and author news.