US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review: What It Means and What Comes Next

<p class=”dek”>The decision to skip the U.N.’s universal review marks a sharp policy break—and puts “US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review” at the center of a global debate over accountability.</p>

What happened—and why it’s historic

In a rare move with global repercussions, the United States confirmed it will not take part in the U.N.’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of its own record this cycle. Multiple outlets report that Washington notified U.N. officials it will neither submit a national report nor appear for the scheduled November 2025 review—making the U.S. the first country in the mechanism’s history to sit one out. That’s the headline: US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review, and the U.N. human rights office expressed regret, stressing that U.S. engagement has historically strengthened protections worldwide. Reuters

What the UPR is—and why it matters

The UPR is the Human Rights Council’s flagship peer-review process: every member state, on an equal footing, undergoes a public assessment roughly every 4½ years based on a national report and independent compilations. The fourth cycle began in November 2022 and runs through mid-2027, with calendars and submission windows set well in advance. When US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review, it removes one of the system’s most influential participants from a forum designed for universal participation and reciprocal scrutiny. OHCHR+1

Why now? The administration’s rationale

Officials link the boycott to a broader directive to disengage from U.N. bodies they argue are biased or ineffective. A February 4, 2025 executive order signaled a reassessment of participation and funding across organizations, citing longstanding concerns about politicization at the Human Rights Council. Against that backdrop, the state of play is: US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review because, the administration argues, participating would “imply endorsement” of a Council that fails to condemn serious abuses by some states. ReutersThe White House

Looking back: from 2018 withdrawal to today

This is not the first rupture. The U.S. withdrew from the Human Rights Council in June 2018, calling it a “protector of human rights abusers” and “a cesspool of political bias.” While the U.S. later re-engaged to varying degrees, the new stance revives the earlier critique—this time by skipping the signature review of its own record. In short, the history helps explain the headline now echoing through Geneva: US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review. U.S. Mission to UN GenevaAl Jazeera

What critics say the U.S. loses by staying out

Rights organizations and former U.S. officials warn that absence diminishes credibility and hands cover to authoritarian states that would prefer fewer questions. They argue that the UPR, while imperfect, has nudged reforms across regions precisely because influential countries modeled participation. With US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review, advocates fear the signal effect: if Washington opts out, others may follow—or discount peer recommendations as optional theater. Statements from Human Rights First, PEN America, and the ACLU framed the move as unprecedented and damaging to U.S. leadership on human rights. Human Rights FirstPEN AmericaAmerican Civil Liberties Union

What the administration says it gains

Supporters inside the government counter that engagement has too often lent legitimacy to a forum that serially targets allies and soft-pedals egregious violators. They contend resources are better spent on bilateral pressure, sanctions regimes, law-enforcement partnerships against trafficking, and support for civil society—without the optics of endorsing a flawed system. In that telling, US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review becomes a strategic choice to shift leverage elsewhere. Reuters notes, however, there are no formal penalties for non-participation—only reputational costs. Reuters

Practical consequences: near-term and long-term

Near-term, the UPR session will proceed without a U.S. presentation. Other stakeholders’ compilations and NGO submissions will still be compiled and discussed, but the dynamic changes when the state under review is absent. Over the longer term, if US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review becomes a pattern rather than a one-off, the “universal” in universal periodic review is strained, inviting reciprocity from rivals and raising the odds of fragmented parallel processes outside the U.N. system. OHCHR documentation underscores that universality and equal treatment are core to the UPR’s legitimacy; selective participation erodes both. OHCHR

Implications for allies and adversaries

Allies invested in rule-of-law diplomacy may press Washington privately to re-enter the process in the current cycle (which runs until July 2027) or commit to the next. Some may fill the vacuum by sponsoring thematic resolutions or stepping up voluntary pledges at their own reviews. Adversaries, by contrast, can spin US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review as proof of double standards—especially in debates over conflict conduct, surveillance, detention, and migration enforcement. The Council’s public calendar and NGO guides show how structured and predictable the process is; opting out invites counternarratives Washington cannot rebut in the room. UPR info+1

Domestic politics: accountability cuts both ways

At home, the decision will likely be read through partisan lenses. Supporters will say the UPR had become performative; critics will say the U.S. is dodging questions it asks of others. There is also a practical domestic benefit to engagement: the UPR can be a forcing mechanism for interagency stock-takes on policing, prisons, labor, gender equity, and minority rights. When US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review, that structured self-assessment—however uncomfortable—doesn’t happen in the same disciplined, public way. The State Department’s own explainer on the process highlights the value of compiling data and responding to recommendations, even when they’re non-binding. State

Can the U.S. change course?

Yes. The current review window extends through mid-2027, and precedent shows the Council has handled postponements and late submissions. Diplomatically, the door is rarely locked. A mid-cycle reversal would blunt the “US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review” storyline and re-center debate on substance—what the U.S. is doing to improve at home and abroad. But absent that pivot, expect the issue to surface in bilateral meetings and multilateral votes as partners calibrate their own engagement strategies. Reuters

Bottom line

US Boycotts UN Human Rights Review is more than a headline; it’s a consequential choice about where—and whether—the United States submits to the same scrutiny it encourages elsewhere. The administration frames non-participation as principled distance from a flawed body; advocates see a self-inflicted wound that weakens norms Washington helped build. The next move—re-engage this cycle or double down—will shape both global perceptions of U.S. leadership and the practical health of the UPR itself.

Connect with the Author

Curious about the inspiration behind The Unmaking of America or want to follow the latest news and insights from J.T. Mercer? Dive deeper and stay connected through the links below—then explore Vera2 for sharp, timely reporting.

About the Author

Discover more about J.T. Mercer’s background, writing journey, and the real-world events that inspired The Unmaking of America. Learn what drives the storytelling and how this trilogy came to life.
[Learn more about J.T. Mercer]

NRP Dispatch Blog

Stay informed with the NRP Dispatch blog, where you’ll find author updates, behind-the-scenes commentary, and thought-provoking articles on current events, democracy, and the writing process.
[Read the NRP Dispatch]

Vera2 — News & Analysis

Looking for the latest reporting, explainers, and investigative pieces? Visit Vera2, North River Publications’ news and analysis hub. Vera2 covers politics, civil society, global affairs, courts, technology, and more—curated with context and built for readers who want clarity over noise.
[Explore Vera2]

Whether you’re interested in the creative process, want to engage with fellow readers, or simply want the latest updates, these resources are the best way to stay in touch with the world of The Unmaking of America—and with the broader news ecosystem at Vera2.

Free Chapter

Begin reading The Unmaking of America today and experience a story that asks: What remains when the rules are gone, and who will stand up when it matters most? Join the Fall of America mailing list below to receive the first chapter of The Unmaking of America for free and stay connected for updates, bonus material, and author news.

Read the first chapter free

Vera2, Global Affairs

Us Boycotts Un Human Rights Review | Us Rejects Taking Part