Female veterans on combat standards: one standard, one mission
Why the female veterans pushback matters now
Female veterans are pushing back forcefully against new rhetoric about restoring a so-called “male standard” for combat roles. In the days surrounding a rare summit of senior commanders at Quantico, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and allies argued that recent fitness and grooming policies had softened expectations, and they floated a shift toward benchmarks keyed to historic male averages. Female veterans countered that the U.S. military has long required a single job standard for the job to be done, and that the question is not whose standard it is but whether the test validly measures mission performance. Public reporting on the Quantico event and follow-on guidance confirms that top leadership is considering service-wide changes with sex-neutral, age-normed scoring for combat arms, sparking a debate in which female veterans are central voices. Politico+1
The renewed argument lands after a decade of policy milestones. The Pentagon formally lifted the combat exclusion in 2013, and by late 2015 all combat jobs were opened to qualified women after validation work on task-based standards. Since then, female veterans have added tangible proof points, from Ranger tabs to operational deployments in infantry and special operations enablers, under a regime that was supposed to be performance-validated rather than gender-coded. Reuters+1
What female veterans say the standard already is
Female veterans make three core points. First, the force has moved to job-relevant, empirically validated standards since the combat exclusion fell; the issue is fidelity to that approach, not nostalgia for a past baseline. Second, the Army’s current fitness architecture already includes sex-neutral, age-normed thresholds for combat specialties, with a published minimum profile and a target composite score that is meant to track to actual battlefield tasks. Third, performance in the field—not the label attached to a test—is what proves readiness. News coverage of Hegseth’s proposals, along with the Army’s public materials on its test, shows how these strands have converged and why female veterans reject the implication that standards were quietly lowered for them. Army+1
Those claims are not abstract. When the first two women graduated Ranger School in 2015—and when Maj. Lisa Jaster followed later that year—female veterans emphasized that the curriculum, patrol grading, and recycles were unchanged. Ranger School remained grueling; women succeeded by meeting the same graded tasks. That history gives today’s female veterans a concrete foundation for saying the standard has always been one standard. Army+1
The policy backdrop: how combat integration actually unfolded
The 2013 decision to end the ban on women in direct ground combat shifted the validation burden onto the services. They were required to define occupational tasks, measure what those tasks demanded physiologically, and then align selection, training, and fitness standards to those demands. Oversight work by the Government Accountability Office tracked how the services opened closed occupations, reviewed standards, and set up monitoring plans. In parallel, RAND and other researchers examined cohesion, readiness, and implementation risks, generally finding that leadership, training time, and clear expectations drove outcomes more than gender mix alone. Female veterans point to this record to argue that integration was designed around readiness, not quotas. Government Accountability Office+2RAND Corporation+2
Today’s proposals re-center the debate on scoring schemes and optics. Reports on the Pentagon’s new guidance describe sex-neutral, age-normed thresholds for combat arms and tighter expectations across the board, including for senior leaders. That approach is not, by itself, at odds with the integrated model—so long as each metric can be traced back to tasks that matter. Female veterans say the danger is rhetorical drift: if the goal becomes “male standard” rather than “mission standard,” policy can slide from validation to symbolism. USNI News
What the research and the record actually show
Across multiple studies, the consistent finding is that unit outcomes depend on leadership and training, not simply on who meets an abstract average. A widely cited RAND brief concluded that gender integration has relatively small effects on readiness and morale compared with factors like command climate and resourcing. GAO’s reviews focused attention on how to validate standards, reduce barriers, and police misconduct rather than on relabeling tests. Female veterans argue that these findings support a pragmatic, mission-first model: keep standards that predict performance and injury risk, invest in coaching, and hold everyone—men and women—to the same consequences for falling short. RAND Corporation+1
There is also the matter of proof in the arena. Ranger School graduates, women in infantry billets, and women serving in special operations support roles have accumulated real-world evaluations and deployment records. Their careers proceed under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the same evaluation systems as their male peers. Female veterans say that if gaps appear in outcomes—injury rates, attrition, or deployment readiness—the fix is targeted training and honest, task-linked standards, not a rebranding of expectations around male averages. Army
The rhetoric-versus-readiness problem
Public remarks that frame reform as a return to “male standards” invite two practical risks that female veterans highlight. First, they can miscommunicate to commanders and NCOs that appearance or a single absolute metric matters more than a battery of validated tasks. Second, they can signal to potential recruits that women are provisional participants whose access depends on political cycles, undermining trust in the institution. Axios’ reporting on the female veterans response and Politico’s coverage of the Quantico directives capture why the language chosen by senior leaders matters just as much as the numbers on a scorecard. Words set command climate, and command climate drives outcomes. Axios+1
Female veterans are direct about what they are not asking for. They are not asking for special passes. They are not asking to grandfather in weaker standards. They are asking for transparent, validated, job-relevant metrics that everyone must hit, and for a communications approach that emphasizes war-fighting effects over culture-war labels. That, they argue, is how to attract and retain talent in a force that needs every capable American.
Recruiting, retention, and the talent pipeline
The services are competing for a smaller pool of eligible young people. GAO trend work shows persistent challenges for female service members in promotion and retention, driven by family planning, assignment patterns, and climate issues. Female veterans say the lesson is to shape policies that make high standards achievable—predictable training cycles, fair accommodations for pregnancy and postpartum recovery, and leadership that looks at capability over stereotype. In that environment, equal standards become a draw rather than a deterrent, and female veterans can tell candidates with credibility that the institution values performance above all. Government Accountability Office
Because this debate is unfolding during a broader shutdown fight in Washington, there is also a practical budget dimension. Funding disruptions can delay training dates, freeze travel, and erode the very readiness that stricter standards aim to build. That context, covered widely in late-September reporting, reminds policymakers that rhetoric without resources is noise. Female veterans press the point that standards, training time, and stable budgets are a single system. The Guardian
What a better standard looks like, according to female veterans
Female veterans describe a simple test for any policy package. First, every event in a fitness test should map to a validated task in a combat MOS. Second, the minimums should reflect the threshold needed to do that task safely at speed, with headroom for elite performance. Third, scoring and remediation should be transparent and identical in consequence for all. Fourth, grooming and body composition rules should support health and professionalism without fixating on aesthetics that do not predict performance. Finally, communication should emphasize that standards exist to win wars, not to win arguments.
That framework is compatible with current Army materials describing sex-neutral, age-normed thresholds in combat specialties and with a decade of research on integration. It is also compatible with pride. Female veterans want to keep earning tabs, wings, and MOS identifiers the hard way—and they want everyone to know that is exactly how they earned them. Army
Bottom line
Female veterans reject the premise that returning to a “male standard” is necessary to restore toughness. They argue that the standard has always been a mission standard: define the tasks, validate the test, train to it, and hold every soldier, sailor, airman, and Marine accountable. The record since 2013 shows that when leadership is strong and expectations are clear, units integrate effectively and fight well. The debate should stay anchored there. If reforms tighten, they should tighten in ways that predict battlefield success—because that is the only standard that matters.
Further Reading
Reuters — Pentagon lifts ban on women in front-line combat roles (2013): https://www.reuters.com/article/world/us-politics/pentagon-lifts-ban-on-women-in-combat-idUSBRE90N0SJ/ Reuters
PBS NewsHour — Defense Secretary Carter opens all combat jobs to women (2015): https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/watch-live-defense-secretary-carter-to-lift-ban-on-women-in-combat-jobs PBS
U.S. Army — First women graduate Ranger School (2015): https://www.army.mil/article/154286/first_women_graduate_ranger_school and Maj. Lisa Jaster’s graduation (2015): https://www.army.mil/article/157260/maj_lisa_jaster_37_first_female_army_reserve_soldier_graduates_army_ranger_school Army+1
U.S. Army — Army Fitness Test overview and thresholds: https://www.army.mil/aft Army
USNI News — Pentagon issues new guidance on physical fitness and grooming standards following Quantico speech: https://news.usni.org/2025/09/30/pentagon-issues-new-guidance-on-physical-fitness-grooming-standards-following-quantico-speech USNI News
GAO — DOD is expanding combat service opportunities for women and validating standards (2015): https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-15-589 and Women in Special Operations (2022): https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-23-105168.pdf Government Accountability Office+1
RAND — Cohesion and integrating women into ground combat and SOF; readiness effects: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1000/RR1058/RAND_RR1058.pdf and “Women Are Not a Problem” brief: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB7515.html RAND Corporation+1
Axios — Female veterans slam questioning of their combat fitness after Quantico speech: https://www.axios.com/2025/10/01/hegseth-women-combat-roles-quantico-speech Axios
The Guardian (live) — Shutdown context and political backdrop: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2025/sep/30/us-government-shutdown-funding-trump-vance-portland-hegseth-latest-updates The Guardian
Connect with the Author
Curious about the inspiration behind The Unmaking of America or want to follow the latest news and insights from J.T. Mercer? Dive deeper and stay connected through the links below—then explore Vera2 for sharp, timely reporting.
About the Author
Discover more about J.T. Mercer’s background, writing journey, and the real-world events that inspired The Unmaking of America. Learn what drives the storytelling and how this trilogy came to life.
[Learn more about J.T. Mercer]
NRP Dispatch Blog
Stay informed with the NRP Dispatch blog, where you’ll find author updates, behind-the-scenes commentary, and thought-provoking articles on current events, democracy, and the writing process.
[Read the NRP Dispatch]
Vera2 — News & Analysis
Looking for the latest reporting, explainers, and investigative pieces? Visit Vera2, North River Publications’ news and analysis hub. Vera2 covers politics, civil society, global affairs, courts, technology, and more—curated with context and built for readers who want clarity over noise.
[Explore Vera2]
Whether you’re interested in the creative process, want to engage with fellow readers, or simply want the latest updates, these resources are the best way to stay in touch with the world of The Unmaking of America—and with the broader news ecosystem at Vera2.
Free Chapter
Begin reading The Unmaking of America today and experience a story that asks: What remains when the rules are gone, and who will stand up when it matters most? Join the Fall of America mailing list below to receive the first chapter of The Unmaking of America for free and stay connected for updates, bonus material, and author news.
