Trump China Deal: Why a New Trade Agreement Could Reset U.S.–China Relations

The Trump China Deal has become shorthand for a potential reset in the world’s most consequential bilateral economic relationship. After years of tariff escalation, retaliations, and partial truces, the prospect of a fresh agreement raises a basic question: can the Trump China Deal deliver tangible relief for American consumers and businesses without sacrificing leverage on structural issues like intellectual property, market access, and technology transfer? This analysis explains what a realistic pathway could look like, what the data says about past rounds of tariffs and “Phase One,” and how a revived negotiation might ripple through politics, supply chains, and household budgets.

How We Got Here: From Tariffs to a Truce and Back Again

When the United States launched sweeping tariffs in 2018, the policy aimed to force Beijing to address long-standing grievances over forced technology transfer and weak IP protection. The immediate result was a tit-for-tat cycle. Tariffs covered hundreds of billions of dollars in goods, touching sectors from semiconductors and machinery to agricultural exports. Independent economic studies subsequently found that U.S. importers and consumers absorbed much of the tariff cost, which showed up as higher prices and margin pressure for American firms. Public watchdogs, think tanks, and academic economists documented how the duties raised input costs and complicated global sourcing even as trade imbalances persisted.

In January 2020, Washington and Beijing signed the “Phase One” accord, a limited truce that preserved most tariffs while promising increased Chinese purchases of U.S. goods and better legal treatment of foreign intellectual property. The pandemic, shipping chaos, and demand shocks kept many of those purchase targets out of reach, and most tariffs remained in place. As of 2025, the tariff structure still sits well above pre-2018 levels, and the debate has shifted from whether tariffs should exist to how they are calibrated, enforced, and sequenced in any new bargain. Any credible Trump China Deal must therefore grapple with what Phase One achieved, where it fell short, and how to stage relief without eroding negotiating leverage. For historical timelines and primary texts, see Reuters’ trade-war chronology, the USTR’s published Phase One agreement, and recent Congressional Research Service updates on tariff actions. Reuters+3Reuters+3United States Trade Representative+3

What a Practical Trump China Deal Would Likely Include

A practical framework for a Trump China Deal would be incremental rather than sweeping. The logic is simple: sequence concessions so each side can verify compliance before advancing to the next step. On the U.S. side, that typically means phasing down select tariff lines that weigh most heavily on consumer prices or critical inputs for small and medium-sized manufacturers. On China’s side, it means measurable, time-bound commitments in areas where monitoring is feasible, such as import licensing transparency, data localization rules for financial services, and audit-ready evidence of reduced administrative pressure on tech transfer.

Agriculture is an early candidate for confidence-building because the bookkeeping is straightforward and the political salience is high in both countries. A revived purchase pathway could stabilize farm incomes and rebuild relationships with Chinese buyers across soy, sorghum, beef, and corn, so long as commitments are insulated from sudden administrative suspensions. But the Trump China Deal cannot succeed on commodity purchases alone. Legal durability around intellectual property and clearer channels for redress are the crux of long-term stability. The Phase One text laid out IP and technology-transfer chapters; a new accord would need to sharpen those provisions into faster dispute windows and automatic consequences for non-compliance, with periodic public reporting so businesses can plan with more confidence. United States Trade Representative+1

The Economic Stakes for Households and Firms

For households, the stakes in a Trump China Deal show up in prices and availability. Tariffs on everyday goods—appliances, electronics, clothing—can lift shelf prices or compress retailer margins that would otherwise fund service and selection. Reducing the most inflation-sensitive lines first would flow through to headline and core inflation measures with a lag, but the signal to importers and wholesalers is immediate: replenish inventories and pass through savings where competition demands it. For firms, especially manufacturers that depend on globally sourced components, tariff relief lowers input costs and can unlock deferred capex. Studies after 2018 detailed how higher duties cut into profits and forced trade diversion; the right blend of tariff calibration and compliance guardrails could unwind that drag without surrendering leverage on structural issues. Recent analyses from Brookings and academic researchers provide quantitative estimates of who paid the tariffs and how costs propagated through supply chains. Brookings+2Brookings+2

Politics and the Optics of Strength

Trade strategy is as much about optics as it is about line-item schedules. A White House will frame a Trump China Deal as proof that toughness yields results. Critics will counter that headline relief must not obscure the reality that many tariffs remain and that structural reforms are still contested. The political test is whether households perceive real relief in prices and whether small manufacturers and farmers feel a sustained, bankable improvement in market access and costs. With campaign cycles compressing attention spans, a stepwise deal that produces early, visible benefits—lower effective prices in a handful of categories, firmer farm purchase schedules, faster IP case handling—could dominate the narrative. Conversely, if promised relief stalls or verification falters, opponents will argue the effort reprised Phase One’s weaknesses. For a sense of how reporting has framed earlier milestones and upcoming deadlines, see Reuters’ recent explainers and timelines alongside CRS tracking summaries. Reuters+2Reuters+2

What Verification Would Look Like This Time

Verification is the bridge between announcement and reality. The Phase One experience showed that broad pledges without short feedback loops can drift when shocks hit. A more resilient Trump China Deal would emphasize quarterly checkpoints with public-facing dashboards in areas where data can be audited, such as aggregate import values for specified categories, case timelines for IP enforcement, and the number of resolved licensing applications in finance and cloud services. On the U.S. side, tariff stepdowns could be tied to these checkpoints rather than calendar dates. On China’s side, market-access steps—like expanded quotas or clarified standards regimes—could be published with unambiguous eligibility criteria. To reinforce credibility, both sides could agree that unresolved disputes revert the last step of tariff relief automatically until rectified, avoiding all-or-nothing cliff edges that spook markets. The U.S. government’s publication of the Phase One text and periodic agency assessments offers a model for accessible, primary documentation. United States Trade Representative+1

Supply Chains After 2018: What Changes, What Doesn’t

Even if a Trump China Deal trims tariff burdens, supply chains will not snap back to a 2017 baseline. Many firms have already diversified assembly to Vietnam, Mexico, and other hubs. Some Chinese producers have reorganized routes through North American partners, raising scrutiny about circumvention risks. Future enforcement will likely marry tariff policy with more targeted investment screening and export controls in sensitive technologies. That means the ceiling for full normalization is lower than it was before 2018, but the floor can be raised meaningfully if predictability returns for most non-sensitive goods. For context on circumvention questions and shifting trade flows, see recent Brookings research. Brookings

What Markets Will Watch on Announcement Day

If negotiators unveil a Trump China Deal, markets will parse five details. First, the tariff schedule: which lines, what percentages, and over what timeline. Second, agriculture and energy purchase commitments, plus enforcement if volumes lag. Third, intellectual property and data-transfer rules with defined case clocks. Fourth, technology carve-outs that clarify what remains off-limits due to national security. Fifth, the snapback mechanism that deters backsliding without reigniting a spiral. The more concrete the timetable and the more automatic the consequences, the faster CFOs and procurement chiefs can lock in 2026 budgets, and the sooner retailers can negotiate price lists for the coming season.

Bottom Line: A Reset Without Illusions

A credible Trump China Deal would not end strategic competition, but it could trade heat for light. Phase down cost-intensive tariffs where verification is possible, lock in measurable market-access steps, and build verification windows so both sides can claim fairness at home. Voters will judge the outcome by two metrics: whether prices ease at the register and whether businesses regain the certainty to invest. The experience since 2018—documented in timelines, government texts, and economic studies—shows that precision and transparency beat one-off announcements. If the next agreement learns those lessons, the Trump China Deal could become a genuine turning point rather than another headline.

Connect with the Author

Curious about the inspiration behind The Unmaking of America or want to follow the latest news and insights from J.T. Mercer? Dive deeper and stay connected through the links below—then explore Vera2 for sharp, timely reporting.

About the Author

Discover more about J.T. Mercer’s background, writing journey, and the real-world events that inspired The Unmaking of America. Learn what drives the storytelling and how this trilogy came to life.
[Learn more about J.T. Mercer]

NRP Dispatch Blog

Stay informed with the NRP Dispatch blog, where you’ll find author updates, behind-the-scenes commentary, and thought-provoking articles on current events, democracy, and the writing process.
[Read the NRP Dispatch]

Vera2 — News & Analysis

Looking for the latest reporting, explainers, and investigative pieces? Visit Vera2, North River Publications’ news and analysis hub. Vera2 covers politics, civil society, global affairs, courts, technology, and more—curated with context and built for readers who want clarity over noise.
[Explore Vera2]

Whether you’re interested in the creative process, want to engage with fellow readers, or simply want the latest updates, these resources are the best way to stay in touch with the world of The Unmaking of America—and with the broader news ecosystem at Vera2.

Free Chapter

Begin reading The Unmaking of America today and experience a story that asks: What remains when the rules are gone, and who will stand up when it matters most? Join the Fall of America mailing list below to receive the first chapter of The Unmaking of America for free and stay connected for updates, bonus material, and author news.

Read the first chapter free

Post Views: 2

Vera2, Global Affairs

Trump China Deal: How a New Agreement Could Reset U.S.–China Trade