Trump refugee rhetoric after the National Guard shooting

Trump refugee rhetoric has taken a sharp, deliberate turn in the wake of the National Guard shooting in Washington, D.C. What began as a tragic attack on two young Guard members has quickly been converted into a sweeping indictment of Afghan refugees, a justification for halting Afghan immigration, and a springboard for calls to “permanently pause” migration from what President Trump calls “third world countries.” The Guardian+1

The gap between what actually happened and how it is being framed is the core story here. Trump refugee rhetoric is not just a reaction to one crime; it is a vehicle for a much broader restructuring of refugee and asylum policy.

Context of the National Guard shooting — Trump refugee rhetoric

On November 26, 2025, two members of the West Virginia National Guard were ambushed near the Farragut West Metro station in downtown Washington, D.C., only a few blocks from the White House. Specialist Sarah Beckstrom, 20, later died of her wounds. Staff Sergeant Andrew Wolfe, 24, remains in critical condition. The Guardian+1

The suspect, 29-year-old Rahmanullah Lakanwal, is an Afghan national who entered the United States in 2021 under Operation Allies Welcome, the emergency program that resettled tens of thousands of Afghans after the fall of Kabul. He reportedly worked with CIA-backed “Zero Units” in Afghanistan before being evacuated and was granted asylum earlier in 2025. The Guardian+2The Washington Post+2

Investigators say Lakanwal drove cross-country from Washington State, used a .357 revolver in what officials call a targeted attack, and was shot and arrested at the scene. The FBI is treating the shooting as a potential act of terrorism. The Washington Post+26abc Philadelphia+2

Within hours, Trump refugee rhetoric had locked onto the suspect’s nationality and immigration path. Instead of describing the assailant as a single radicalized individual, the president framed the episode as proof that there are “a lot of problems with Afghans” and that the broader Afghan refugee population poses an inherent risk. Reuters+1

What Trump refugee rhetoric is actually demanding

In the days after the shooting, Trump refugee rhetoric has revolved around three core claims.

First, the president insists that Afghan evacuees admitted under Operation Allies Welcome were not properly screened. He has repeatedly pointed to inspector-general reports about data gaps and vetting problems as proof that thousands of dangerous people may have slipped through. New York Post+2Office of Inspector General+2

Second, he argues that all refugees and asylum recipients from the Biden years are suspect. On that basis, he has ordered a sweeping review of asylum approvals under the previous administration, together with a re-examination of green cards issued to citizens of 19 “countries of concern,” including Afghanistan. Reuters+2Reuters+2

Third, Trump refugee rhetoric now goes far beyond Afghans. In a Thanksgiving social-media post, he promised to “permanently pause” migration from “third world countries,” end federal benefits for non-citizens, and remove anyone he does not regard as a “net asset” to the United States, without explaining how any of that would work legally. The Guardian+1

These are not narrow adjustments to vetting procedures. They are system-wide moves that treat whole nationalities and categories of people as inherently suspect, and they are being sold to the public through relentless Trump refugee rhetoric tying refugees directly to terrorism and violent crime.

How Afghan vetting actually worked under Operation Allies Welcome

The reality behind the headlines is messy but not as simple as Trump refugee rhetoric suggests. Operation Allies Welcome, launched by the Biden administration in 2021, was an emergency effort to move at-risk Afghans—interpreters, fixers, security personnel, embassy staff, and their families—out of immediate danger. According to Department of Homeland Security documentation, evacuees were processed at overseas “lily pad” bases and in U.S. facilities, where they underwent biometric and biographic screening against intelligence, law-enforcement, and counterterrorism databases. DHS+2Department of Defense Inspector General+2

The system was not flawless. A 2022 DHS inspector-general report and follow-up reviews in 2024 and 2025 found that officials sometimes lacked complete or accurate data and that some evacuees were allowed to travel or enter with derogatory information that had not been fully resolved. Office of Inspector General+2Office of Inspector General+2

However, those same reports did not conclude that Afghan evacuees as a class were uniquely dangerous. They described fragmented databases, overstretched personnel, and rushed decision-making under extreme pressure, not a deliberate policy of ignoring red flags. Subsequent audits and FBI reviews have identified a small number of evacuees who should have faced additional scrutiny, but public evidence does not support the claim—central to Trump refugee rhetoric—that there is a broad, hidden wave of Afghan criminality and terrorism. DOJ Office of Inspector General+2Chuck Grassley+2

Policy fallout: halting Afghan immigration and reopening old cases

What makes this moment different from previous controversies is the scale of the policy response. In direct response to the shooting, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced that it has stopped processing all immigration requests relating to Afghan nationals “indefinitely,” including asylum applications, parole renewals, green card adjustments, and family reunification cases. Reuters+2Reuters+2

Trump refugee rhetoric has then been used to justify measures that reach well beyond Afghans. Under orders from the White House, immigration officials are now reviewing every asylum case approved under the Biden administration and re-examining green cards granted to citizens of the designated countries of concern. Roughly 233,000 refugees admitted between January 2021 and February 2025 are being swept into this review. Reuters+2Reuters+2

For Afghans still abroad who were counting on U.S. visas as a last path out of danger, the effect is brutal. Reuters has documented Afghan families in Pakistan and inside Afghanistan who now see the D.C. attack as the moment their final hope disappeared, because Trump refugee rhetoric has made them politically radioactive. Reuters+1

For Afghans already in the United States on humanitarian parole or recently granted asylum, the message is just as chilling. Cases they thought were settled can be reopened. Status they thought was secure is suddenly provisional. Trump refugee rhetoric has turned them from neighbors and co-workers back into conditional guests whose future depends on a political calculation.

Human consequences of Trump refugee rhetoric

The immediate human impact of Trump refugee rhetoric shows up in small, unglamorous ways. Community organizations describe Afghans skipping English classes, avoiding public transit, or staying away from mosques because they fear harassment or surveillance. Parents worry their children will be singled out at school, especially in the days after the shooting when news coverage repeatedly emphasized the suspect’s nationality. The Washington Post+1

Advocacy groups that worked closely with evacuees from Kabul now find themselves re-explaining that the overwhelming majority of Afghan refugees have no connection to violence and, in many cases, directly supported U.S. forces at great personal risk. They argue that Trump refugee rhetoric erases the reality that Afghans were allies, not invaders, and that collective punishment of an entire community is both unjust and strategically self-defeating.

At the same time, there is a genuine demand for answers about how a man who allegedly carried out an ambush near the White House passed multiple rounds of screening. That question is valid. The point is that Trump refugee rhetoric jumps from a legitimate concern about one failure to sweeping conclusions about a whole population, then uses those conclusions to justify policies that punish thousands who did nothing wrong.

Political logic behind Trump refugee rhetoric

None of this is happening in a vacuum. Trump refugee rhetoric fits neatly into a broader narrative that has run through his political career: present migration from poorer, non-Western countries as inherently risky, cast refugee programs as Trojan horses for terrorism, and use moments of crisis to push through maximal restrictions.

By tying the shooting to “third world countries” in general, Trump is not just talking about Afghans. He is telling his base that the United States is under siege by outsiders from a long list of nations, and that only sweeping bans and retroactive reviews can keep Americans safe. The Guardian+1

The fact that the suspect’s asylum was granted under Trump’s own watch complicates this story. Reuters has reported that Lakanwal’s asylum approval came earlier in 2025, after Trump returned to office and his own agencies took control of the vetting pipeline. Reuters+1 Trump refugee rhetoric largely skips over that detail, focusing instead on the initial Biden-era evacuation and earlier data gaps.

Politically, the strategy is obvious. Trump refugee rhetoric gives the White House a way to blame Biden for a tragedy, to energize voters who favor hardline immigration policies, and to justify a radical rollback of refugee and asylum commitments without having to grapple with the individual stories behind each case file.

Why Trump refugee rhetoric matters beyond this case

If the concern were simply that one man slipped through a flawed system, the logical response would be targeted: identify which databases failed, tighten protocols, and adjust procedures. Instead, Trump refugee rhetoric is driving a very different response: a blanket halt on Afghan immigration, a sweeping re-examination of prior approvals, and a promise to shut the door on entire regions of the world.

That shift has several long-term consequences.

It normalizes the idea that whole nationalities can be treated as a single security category. Once that becomes acceptable, it is easy to extend it from Afghans to other groups whenever a crisis or crime can be linked, however tenuously, to a particular country or faith.

It undermines the credibility of U.S. commitments to allies. Afghans who risked their lives for American forces are watching Trump refugee rhetoric turn them into suspects. Future local partners in other conflicts will take note, and may think twice before trusting U.S. promises of protection.

It corrodes the concept of individualized justice. Modern asylum and refugee systems are built on the idea that each case is judged on its own merits—on what a person has done, suffered, or risked. Trump refugee rhetoric pushes toward a cruder standard: what passport you carry and which headline your nationality appears in.

The National Guard shooting is tragic, and the demand for accountability is real. But if the policy response continues to be shaped primarily by Trump refugee rhetoric rather than by evidence and proportionality, the damage will extend far beyond one incident, one suspect, or one refugee program.

Connect with the Author

Curious about the inspiration behind The Unmaking of America or want to follow the latest news and insights from J.T. Mercer? Dive deeper and stay connected through the links below—then explore Vera2 for sharp, timely reporting.

About the Author

Discover more about J.T. Mercer’s background, writing journey, and the real-world events that inspired The Unmaking of America. Learn what drives the storytelling and how this trilogy came to life.
[Learn more about J.T. Mercer]

NRP Dispatch Blog

Stay informed with the NRP Dispatch blog, where you’ll find author updates, behind-the-scenes commentary, and thought-provoking articles on current events, democracy, and the writing process.
[Read the NRP Dispatch]

Vera2 — News & Analysis

Looking for the latest reporting, explainers, and investigative pieces? Visit Vera2, North River Publications’ news and analysis hub. Vera2 covers politics, civil society, global affairs, courts, technology, and more—curated with context and built for readers who want clarity over noise.
[Explore Vera2]

Whether you’re interested in the creative process, want to engage with fellow readers, or simply want the latest updates, these resources are the best way to stay in touch with the world of The Unmaking of America—and with the broader news ecosystem at Vera2.

Free Chapter

Begin reading The Unmaking of America today and experience a story that asks: What remains when the rules are gone, and who will stand up when it matters most? Join the Fall of America mailing list below to receive the first chapter of The Unmaking of America for free and stay connected for updates, bonus material, and author news.

Read the first chapter free

Post Views: 3

Vera2, White House & Politics

Trump’s refugee rhetoric after the National Guard shooting