Epstein Files Reveal Notable Names

The latest tranche of Epstein files has pushed a long-simmering story back to the center of global politics, finance, and media. More than 20,000 pages of emails, flight manifests, calendar entries, call logs, and financial records from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate and related court cases are now public, and the Epstein files are filled with references to prominent figures whose reputations were already tightly intertwined with power.The Washington Post+3TIME+3Axios+3

As journalists and lawmakers comb through the Epstein files, names such as Michael Wolff, Larry Summers, and Peter Thiel keep resurfacing. Their inclusion does not, by itself, prove criminal conduct. But it does raise uncomfortable questions about why so many influential people stayed in Epstein’s orbit after his 2008 sex-offense conviction—and what that says about how power really works.

What the Epstein files actually are

Despite years of conspiracy theories about a secret “client list,” the Justice Department and FBI have now stated that there is no single master list and no evidence that Epstein ran a blackmail operation targeting unnamed elites.Wikipedia Instead, the Epstein files released in 2025 are a patchwork of real-world records: email correspondence, phone messages, travel logs, meeting notes, and financial documents gathered by courts, Congress, and the Epstein estate.Oversight Democrats+1

The newest batch of Epstein files, released by Democrats and Republicans on the House Oversight Committee, covers interactions spanning roughly 2013 to 2019. These documents show Epstein exchanging messages with politicians, journalists, academics, tech executives, venture capitalists, and celebrities—even after he was a convicted sex offender.TIME+2Scientific American+2

In other words, the Epstein files do not hand the public a neat list of villains. Instead, they reveal social and professional networks: who emailed whom, who took flights, who sought donations, and who treated Epstein as a useful connection long after his crimes were known.

High-profile figures named in the Epstein files

Michael Wolff and journalism ethics

One of the most surprising names in the Epstein files is Michael Wolff, the journalist and author who became widely known for his Trump-era book “Fire and Fury.” Newly released emails show Wolff corresponding with Epstein about Donald Trump and other topics, at times sounding more like a media strategist than a detached reporter.TIME+2ABC News+2

According to reporting on the Epstein files, Wolff appears to advise Epstein on how to shape his public image and navigate press coverage, rather than simply interviewing him as a source.The Atlantic+1 Media-ethics scholars say it is not unusual for journalists to cultivate powerful sources, but they argue that the Epstein files highlight how easily those relationships can slide into problematic territory when a reporter begins offering strategic help to someone with Epstein’s record.

Wolff has defended himself by saying he was gathering material and that journalists often get close to controversial figures. Still, his presence in the Epstein files has prompted uncomfortable conversations about where the line lies between access journalism and collaboration, especially when the subject is a convicted sex offender.

Larry Summers and elite institutions

The Epstein files also shed new light on the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Larry Summers, the former U.S. Treasury Secretary and former president of Harvard University. News outlets and university reporters have documented hundreds of emails between Summers and Epstein from 2013 through 2019, discussing politics, Harvard projects, personal matters, and introductions to other powerful people.The Harvard Crimson+2The Guardian+2

Flight records included in earlier Epstein files show Summers flying on Epstein’s private jet several times in the mid-2000s, including a 2005 trip to the U.S. Virgin Islands near Epstein’s private island, alongside Ghislaine Maxwell.New York Post Harvard previously acknowledged that multiple faculty members had taken donations or meetings with Epstein, but said a 2020 internal review did not find clear policy violations in Summers’s case.The Harvard Crimson+1

So far, no law-enforcement agency has accused Summers of criminal involvement, and the Epstein files do not show him participating in Epstein’s abuse. What they do show is a long-running relationship between a convicted sex offender and one of the most influential economists of his generation—raising questions about why that relationship continued after Epstein’s conviction and what that says about the judgment of those at the top of elite institutions.

Peter Thiel and venture capital money

Another recurring name in the Epstein files is Peter Thiel, the billionaire co-founder of PayPal and an early Facebook investor. Congressional releases and investigative reporting show that Epstein discussed potential meetings with Thiel and maintained financial ties to one of Thiel’s firms.The Washington Post+2The Guardian+2

Estate documents reviewed by journalists indicate that Epstein invested roughly 40 million dollars in funds operated by Valar Ventures, a venture capital firm co-founded by Thiel; that stake later grew to an estimated 170 million dollars, one of the largest remaining assets in Epstein’s estate.The Economic Times Thiel’s representatives have said the investment was handled at arm’s length and that Thiel had no personal involvement in Epstein’s crimes.

Again, the Epstein files stop short of alleging that Thiel was aware of or complicit in abuse. Instead, they highlight how Epstein remained plugged into high finance and Silicon Valley even after he became publicly known as a sex offender, suggesting that access to capital and connections often outweighed reputational risk.

What the Epstein files do—and do not—prove

It is crucial to distinguish between being named in the Epstein files and being guilty of a crime. Many of the interactions the documents capture are emails, meeting requests, or social introductions. The fact that someone appears in the Epstein files does not mean they participated in trafficking or abuse, and several figures mentioned in the documents have issued statements denying wrongdoing or clarifying the nature of their contact.AOL+1

The Justice Department’s 2025 memo, which concluded there is no secret “client list” and no evidence of a broader blackmail scheme, underscores that point.Wikipedia At the same time, the Epstein files show how many leaders in politics, academia, tech, and media were comfortable treating Epstein as a donor, adviser, or social contact even after his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor. That pattern raises moral and institutional questions even when legal liability is absent.

For institutions like universities, banks, and venture funds, the Epstein files are now a stress test. Boards and stakeholders want to know who knew what, when they knew it, and why ties to Epstein persisted anyway. Internal reviews at Harvard, JPMorgan, and other organizations are one answer; public trust will depend on whether those reviews look thorough or like damage control.New York Post+2The Harvard Crimson+2

Public reaction and media coverage

The public response to the most recent releases of Epstein files has been a mix of outrage, fatigue, and suspicion. Many people see the documents as proof that wealth and power insulated Epstein for years. Others, understandably skeptical of government transparency, question why some names appear heavily redacted while others are spelled out in full.

Media coverage reflects this complexity. Outlets like Time, Axios, and The Independent have focused on summarizing which figures appear in the Epstein files and in what context, emphasizing that many of the interactions amount to meetings, emails, or investment relationships rather than smoking-gun evidence of crimes.Scientific American+3TIME+3Axios+3 Opinion writers and newsletters, by contrast, have gone deeper into the reputational fallout—especially for people such as Michael Wolff, whose role as a journalist is now being debated in light of his tone with Epstein.The Atlantic+1

On social media, the phrase “Epstein files” has become a shorthand for broad institutional rot. Some users demand that every name be published unredacted. Others argue that leaking partial information can unfairly smear people whose contact with Epstein was incidental or brief. In that environment, it is easy for speculation to outrun the actual content of the Epstein files, which makes careful reporting and context even more important.

Why the Epstein files matter for accountability

Even in a hyperpolarized moment, the Epstein case cuts through the noise because it sits at the intersection of sex crimes, money, and political power. The Epstein files are important not because they magically expose a single “client list,” but because they document how one well-connected predator moved through elite networks and kept influence long after his crimes were known.

For public figures, being mentioned in the Epstein files should trigger serious questions: Did they know about his conviction? Did they continue to seek money or access anyway? Did their institutions encourage or overlook those ties? Transparent answers to those questions matter more than reflexive denials or partisan spin.

For the public, the Epstein files are a reminder that accountability rarely arrives in a neat package. It comes through slow, sometimes frustrating releases of documents, through rigorous reporting, and through consistent pressure on institutions that would otherwise prefer these questions go away.

Ultimately, the Epstein files do not just reveal notable names. They reveal how proximity to power can warp judgment—and how much work remains if society is serious about holding powerful people and institutions to the same standards as everyone else.

Connect with the Author

Curious about the inspiration behind The Unmaking of America or want to follow the latest news and insights from J.T. Mercer? Dive deeper and stay connected through the links below—then explore Vera2 for sharp, timely reporting.

About the Author

Discover more about J.T. Mercer’s background, writing journey, and the real-world events that inspired The Unmaking of America. Learn what drives the storytelling and how this trilogy came to life.
[Learn more about J.T. Mercer]

NRP Dispatch Blog

Stay informed with the NRP Dispatch blog, where you’ll find author updates, behind-the-scenes commentary, and thought-provoking articles on current events, democracy, and the writing process.
[Read the NRP Dispatch]

Vera2 — News & Analysis

Looking for the latest reporting, explainers, and investigative pieces? Visit Vera2, North River Publications’ news and analysis hub. Vera2 covers politics, civil society, global affairs, courts, technology, and more—curated with context and built for readers who want clarity over noise.
[Explore Vera2]

Whether you’re interested in the creative process, want to engage with fellow readers, or simply want the latest updates, these resources are the best way to stay in touch with the world of The Unmaking of America—and with the broader news ecosystem at Vera2.

Free Chapter

Begin reading The Unmaking of America today and experience a story that asks: What remains when the rules are gone, and who will stand up when it matters most? Join the Fall of America mailing list below to receive the first chapter of The Unmaking of America for free and stay connected for updates, bonus material, and author news.

Read the first chapter free

Post Views: 9

Vera2, Investigations & Corruption

Epstein Files: Who Else Was Mentioned?