Telecom shutdown in Afghanistan: the blackout’s toll on people, business, and rights
What triggered the telecom shutdown
Afghanistan has entered a perilous new phase: a telecom shutdown that severs ordinary people from information, markets, and each other. Reports from network observers and civil society groups indicate widespread disruption to mobile networks and backbone connectivity, consistent with fiber cuts and administrative orders that force operators to disable service. In practical terms, the telecom shutdown means phone calls don’t complete, messaging apps time out, and websites simply don’t load for vast stretches of the country. For a nation where mobile phones became the primary on-ramp to the economy over the past decade, the sudden silence is not just inconvenient—it is destabilizing.
The pattern fits what digital rights groups have documented since the Taliban takeover: pressure on telecom providers, periodic outages targeted at regions of resistance, and creeping restrictions on speech. When a ruling authority combines physical control over infrastructure with licensing power over carriers, it can turn a switch and plunge entire provinces into darkness. That is exactly why observers call this a telecom shutdown and not merely a technical failure. It is an exercise of control over communication at national scale.
International monitors have mapped repeated drops in connectivity across Afghan networks since 2021. Those measurements—packet loss, traffic volume collapse, and route withdrawals—are the telltale signatures of a telecom shutdown. The latest phase is broader and longer, which raises the cost for families trying to stay in touch and for businesses that can’t process payments, verify deliveries, or confirm orders.
Daily life and the economy under a telecom shutdown
Daily life grinds down in surprising ways when a telecom shutdown hits. Parents can’t call children walking home from school. Shopkeepers who use WhatsApp to restock inventory wait in limbo. Farmers hoping to check produce prices or coordinate transport can’t reach buyers in Kabul or Herat. Health workers lose the ability to verify lab results or locate critical supplies. Even simple coordination—“Are you safe?”—becomes impossible. The human stress of that uncertainty accumulates hour by hour.
The economic damage compounds quickly. Afghan entrepreneurs increasingly rely on social platforms and messaging apps to find customers and handle cash-on-delivery logistics. With a telecom shutdown, these low-cost channels vanish. Couriers arrive late or not at all because dispatchers can’t reach them. Micro-retailers who converted to online ordering during the pandemic watch revenue evaporate. Diaspora families attempting to troubleshoot remittances with local agents can’t confirm receipt. While the macro picture will take months to quantify, the microeconomics are immediate: fewer transactions, higher friction, and shrinking household cash flow.
Education and health care suffer in parallel. University lecturers who adopted digital materials can’t distribute them; students lose access to research and assignments; clinics can’t escalate cases to regional specialists. For all the talk of leapfrogging via mobile tech, a telecom shutdown erases those gains in a day. The longer it lasts, the more likely skilled workers and small investors will look for exits—taking their ideas, savings, and energy with them.
Governance, censorship, and the human rights cost
Authorities have offered little credible public justification for severing access. That absence matters because it signals the purpose of a telecom shutdown: to constrain speech and visibility, especially during periods of protest, counter-insurgency, or politically sensitive operations. Human rights groups warn that the blackout chills journalism and blocks documentation of abuses. Without functioning networks, citizens can’t share videos, independent reporters can’t verify claims, and international organizations lose a key channel for situational awareness.
Telecom operators—often privately owned but state-licensed—face impossible choices. Defy orders and risk shutdowns or asset seizures; comply and become instruments of censorship. In many countries, that structural vulnerability has enabled governments to “outsource” repression by compelling carriers to flip the switch. Afghanistan fits the same template. And the cost is borne by ordinary people who neither ordered nor benefit from the blackout.
Civil society advocates argue for clear legal standards: any communication restrictions must be necessary, proportionate, time-bound, transparent, and subject to independent review. A blanket telecom shutdown fails those tests. It is blunt, open-ended, and opaque, with sweeping effects on rights to expression, association, and access to information. The international community’s leverage is limited, but not zero. Donors, humanitarian agencies, and neighboring states can condition parts of their engagement on restoration of core connectivity and the abandonment of network-level censorship.
Trump’s upcoming meeting with congressional leaders amid a U.S. shutdown threat
While Afghanistan contends with a telecom shutdown imposed from the top down, Washington is wrestling with a different kind of shutdown—one rooted in budget brinkmanship. Former President Donald Trump’s upcoming meeting with congressional leaders arrives as deadlines and partisan demands converge on the federal spending process. The stakes are not theoretical. A U.S. government funding lapse disrupts pay for federal workers, halts many services, and slows economic activity. It also degrades America’s ability to project steady leadership abroad at precisely the moment when communications blackouts and humanitarian crises demand sustained attention.
In the near term, Hill negotiators will weigh short-term continuing resolutions against longer-term appropriations, while the White House, agency heads, and governors prepare contingency plans. Trump’s leveraging of the moment—rallying allies, pressuring skeptics, and shaping media narratives—can influence whether Congress coalesces around a stopgap or stumbles into a partial shutdown. Markets dislike uncertainty, and so do families waiting on federal benefits or contractors working on time-sensitive projects. If congressional leaders leave the meeting with a path to bridge policy differences, the U.S. may avoid the worst-case scenario. If not, agencies will dust off “lapse of funding” playbooks that are disruptive even when short.
The juxtaposition is instructive. A telecom shutdown in Afghanistan reveals the harms of unilateral control over infrastructure. A budget shutdown in Washington shows how polarized politics can undermine a complex democracy’s capacity to deliver basic functions. The thread running between them is resilience—of institutions, of networks, and of public trust. Both crises remind us that connectivity and governance are not abstractions; they are the plumbing of modern life.
What comes next—and why it matters
For Afghans, the central demand is simple: restore service. That means lifting administrative blocks, repairing damaged fiber, and allowing operators to stabilize their networks without fear of reprisal. International organizations can expand offline-capable tools for education and health in the interim, but there is no substitute for an open, usable internet. The longer a telecom shutdown persists, the more likely businesses will fold, families will relocate, and the country’s human capital will thin.
For U.S. policymakers, the task is to keep the lights on—literally and figuratively—by reaching an agreement that prevents a funding lapse. The United States cannot advocate credibly for free expression and open networks abroad while telegraphing dysfunction at home. Trump’s meeting with congressional leaders could provide space for a face-saving compromise, but that requires disciplined follow-through from all sides.
Finally, for readers and technologists, the lesson is to design with failure in mind. Mesh networking, satellite links, offline-first apps, and resilient civic media are not silver bullets, but they can soften the edges of a telecom shutdown. In Afghanistan, those stopgaps may become lifelines. In Washington, transparency and contingency planning are the equivalent tools for keeping government reliable during moments of political stress.
Bottom Line
Afghanistan’s telecom shutdown is a sweeping act of control that isolates families, crushes small businesses, and obscures human rights conditions. In the United States, Trump’s upcoming meeting with congressional leaders will test whether political actors can avert a separate kind of shutdown with nationwide consequences. Both stories underscore how essential open networks and functional governance are to modern life—and how quickly they can be undermined.
Further Reading
NetBlocks — Internet performance and shutdown tracking for Afghanistan: https://netblocks.org/country/afghanistan
Access Now — Reports and analysis on internet shutdowns in Afghanistan: https://www.accessnow.org/afghanistan-internet-shutdowns/
Human Rights Watch — Taliban repression of media and free expression: https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/01/05/afghanistan-taliban-crackdown-media-free-expression
Reuters — Taliban cut mobile phone services in Panjshir Valley (context on targeted outages): https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/taliban-cut-mobile-phone-services-panjshir-valley-2021-09-10/
Al Jazeera — Taliban accused of cutting communications in Panjshir (background on blackout tactics): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/10/taliban-cut-communications-panjshir
Connect with the Author
Curious about the inspiration behind The Unmaking of America or want to follow the latest news and insights from J.T. Mercer? Dive deeper and stay connected through the links below—then explore Vera2 for sharp, timely reporting.
About the Author
Discover more about J.T. Mercer’s background, writing journey, and the real-world events that inspired The Unmaking of America. Learn what drives the storytelling and how this trilogy came to life.
[Learn more about J.T. Mercer]
NRP Dispatch Blog
Stay informed with the NRP Dispatch blog, where you’ll find author updates, behind-the-scenes commentary, and thought-provoking articles on current events, democracy, and the writing process.
[Read the NRP Dispatch]
Vera2 — News & Analysis
Looking for the latest reporting, explainers, and investigative pieces? Visit Vera2, North River Publications’ news and analysis hub. Vera2 covers politics, civil society, global affairs, courts, technology, and more—curated with context and built for readers who want clarity over noise.
[Explore Vera2]
Whether you’re interested in the creative process, want to engage with fellow readers, or simply want the latest updates, these resources are the best way to stay in touch with the world of The Unmaking of America—and with the broader news ecosystem at Vera2.
Free Chapter
Begin reading The Unmaking of America today and experience a story that asks: What remains when the rules are gone, and who will stand up when it matters most? Join the Fall of America mailing list below to receive the first chapter of The Unmaking of America for free and stay connected for updates, bonus material, and author news.
