Overview
After Russia’s heaviest air and missile strikes of the war, the debate over Trump sanctions has shifted from whether to tighten penalties to how quickly a tougher package can be assembled and enforced. The administration has signaled readiness to move to a “second phase,” framing sanctions not as symbolism but as a tool to starve Russia’s wartime revenue and restrict access to critical components. Because sanctions take effect over months, clarity of design and discipline of enforcement will determine whether Trump sanctions blunt Moscow’s ability to repeat mass attacks while minimizing collateral shocks for allies.
Context of the Threat — Trump sanctions
The latest strikes hit civilian centers and critical infrastructure, underscoring a strategy to overwhelm air defenses through volume. That surge has intensified pressure on Washington and European capitals to close known loopholes in existing regimes. In this context, Trump sanctions are being discussed as a layered response: squeeze the oil-fueled budget that funds the war, disrupt procurement networks for drones and missiles, and penalize intermediaries that move money, insure ships, or transship restricted goods. Supporters argue that only firmer penalties will curb Russia’s freedom of action; skeptics warn that poorly targeted measures could roil energy markets or alienate swing partners essential to enforcement. Either way, the scale of Russia’s assault has made new Trump sanctions a live policy option rather than a talking point.
Sanctions Track Record and the Gaps to Close
Western measures since 2014—and dramatically expanded after 2022—have restricted banks, central bank assets, technology exports, and energy revenues. Yet Russia adapted: reflagged “shadow fleet” tankers, discounted crude to alternative buyers, and routed dual-use components through permissive jurisdictions. The lesson is plain: sanctions work when they are broad enough to reduce revenue, precise enough to target scarce inputs, and tightly enforced to prevent leakage. Advocates of stronger Trump sanctions say the next tranche must focus less on headline size and more on shutting the pipes that still feed cash and components into the war economy.
What “Phase Two” Might Include
1) Energy revenue pressure (the budget choke point)
A core pillar of tougher Trump sanctions would intensify the price-cap regime on Russian crude and products. That likely means secondary sanctions on:
-
insurers covering shipments above the cap,
-
shipowners and traders enabling evasion, and
-
lenders financing non-compliant cargoes.
The aim is not zero exports overnight but persistent discounts, higher transport costs, and longer voyage times—mechanics that cut net revenue. By coupling penalties with transparent compliance rules, Trump sanctions can push more barrels under the cap while isolating habitual violators.
2) Financial plumbing (cutting the payments lifelines)
Expect designations that target banks and payment processors in third countries that settle Russia-linked energy and procurement transactions. Well-crafted Trump sanctions would map specific correspondent relationships and freeze repeat offenders, raising the cost of doing business with sanctioned entities and reducing the velocity of funds.
3) Dual-use choke points (starving drone and missile lines)
The mass use of Shahed-type drones and cruise missiles hinges on imported electronics, machine tools, optical components, and propellants. A credible “phase two” would expand entity listings, harmonize tariff codes, and surge customs enforcement at known transshipment nodes. Here, Trump sanctions should be paired with industry outreach so OEMs can harden supply-chain due diligence and flag red-flag orders.
4) Maritime enforcement (ending the shadow fleet free ride)
A persistent loophole involves aging tankers operating with murky ownership and questionable safety records. Stronger Trump sanctions could combine:
-
designations of management firms and beneficial owners,
-
port-state control pressure on substandard hulls, and
-
tighter AIS-gap penalties for dark-activity zones.
The practical outcome: fewer compliant insurers willing to touch above-cap cargoes, forcing deeper discounts to offset risk.
5) Allied synchronization (deterrence through unity)
Sanctions scale with coalition discipline. The most effective Trump sanctions would be announced in lockstep with the EU, G7, and like-minded Asian partners, with shared watchlists, synchronized penalties, and joint enforcement sweeps. Coordination shortens evasion routes and limits forum-shopping by intermediaries.
Implications for U.S. Foreign Policy
A robust “phase two” would reaffirm deterrence without crossing into a direct military response. For Washington, Trump sanctions serve three functions: signaling resolve, reducing Russia’s capacity to wage a high-tempo air war, and buying time for Ukrainian air defense replenishment. Diplomatically, the package must balance firmness with incentives for pivotal third countries to comply—offering clear pathways back to lawful trade if standards are met. The strategic bet is that sustained fiscal pressure, compounded by technology scarcity, will degrade Russia’s strike tempo over the next 6–12 months.
Domestic Politics and Messaging
At home, Trump sanctions will be judged by two metrics: effectiveness and affordability. Effectiveness is measured in Russia’s reduced revenue and shrinking munitions output; affordability in the absence of fuel spikes or supply shocks that voters feel. The administration’s public case for tougher steps will land best if it connects the measures to concrete security outcomes—fewer mass-strike nights, stabilized grids in Ukraine—and explains how carve-outs protect global food and energy flows.
Risks and Trade-Offs to Watch
-
Energy ripple effects: Secondary sanctions can pinch legitimate buyers if applied bluntly. Calibrated Trump sanctions would target violators, preserve humanitarian carve-outs, and use licensing to avoid sudden dislocations.
-
Alliance cohesion: Divergent risk tolerances between capitals can create cracks for evasion. The more granular the joint playbook, the harder it is for bad actors to exploit gaps.
-
Retaliation vectors: Moscow can answer via cyberattacks, grain-corridor pressure, or disinformation. Sanctions should be accompanied by resilience planning and public-information campaigns.
-
Legal durability: Rushed listings invite litigation. Meticulous evidentiary records make Trump sanctions stick in court and survive political cycles.
Measuring Success: Concrete, Trackable Indicators
A serious policy needs clear scorecards. For Trump sanctions, watch:
-
Russia’s oil export revenues net of discounts and shipping costs;
-
insurance pricing and availability for tankers tied to above-cap trades;
-
seizure rates and interdictions of dual-use components at known transit hubs;
-
slower refurbishment and output of cruise missiles and drones, reflected in reduced strike frequency or smaller salvos;
-
alignment across G7/EU lists and the pace of joint enforcement actions.
Monthly dashboards that publish these metrics would make Trump sanctions transparent and accountable.
Implementation Playbook: How to Move Fast and Get It Right
-
Phase and signal: Announce a staged rollout with clear thresholds for additional pressure. Signaling helps markets adjust without panic.
-
License precisely: Use targeted general licenses for humanitarian goods and critical commodities, avoiding blanket loopholes.
-
Resource enforcement: Sanctions that aren’t enforced are press releases. Fund investigators, maritime analytics, and customs task forces; share tooling with allies.
-
Close feedback loops: Stand up an interagency “evasion cell” with authority to update designations weekly as new routes emerge. Fast iteration is where Trump sanctions outperform static lists.
-
Engage industry: Hold roundtables with shippers, insurers, and manufacturers; publish red-flag typologies so compliance teams can self-police.
Bottom Line
Russia’s escalated air war has forced a strategic rethink. Well-designed Trump sanctions can cut revenue, throttle supply chains, and complicate evasion—if they are precise, synchronized, and relentlessly enforced. The measure of success is simple but demanding: fewer resources for Moscow’s war, fewer nights of mass strikes, and a stronger foundation for Ukraine’s defense. With clarity of purpose and discipline in execution, Trump sanctions can be more than a headline; they can be a durable constraint on aggression.
Further Reading
-
Reuters — Russia hits Ukraine with biggest air attack of the war; government building damaged in Kyiv. Reuters
-
Reuters — Trump says he is ready for a second stage of sanctions against Russia. Reuters
-
AP News — Ukraine government building damaged in Kyiv in the largest Russian attack since the war began. AP News
-
Al Jazeera — Trump floats new sanctions after Russia’s largest air assault; Treasury signals tougher energy measures. Al Jazeera
-
PBS NewsHour — NATO leaders weigh expanded military support as Russia steps up aerial strikes. PBS
-
Atlantic Council — How Russia’s escalating air offensive is overwhelming defenses in 2025. Atlantic Council
Connect with the Author
Curious about the inspiration behind The Unmaking of America or want to follow the latest news and insights from J.T. Mercer? Dive deeper and stay connected through the links below—then explore Vera2 for sharp, timely reporting.
About the Author
Discover more about J.T. Mercer’s background, writing journey, and the real-world events that inspired The Unmaking of America. Learn what drives the storytelling and how this trilogy came to life.
[Learn more about J.T. Mercer]
NRP Dispatch Blog
Stay informed with the NRP Dispatch blog, where you’ll find author updates, behind-the-scenes commentary, and thought-provoking articles on current events, democracy, and the writing process.
[Read the NRP Dispatch]
Vera2 — News & Analysis
Looking for the latest reporting, explainers, and investigative pieces? Visit Vera2, North River Publications’ news and analysis hub. Vera2 covers politics, civil society, global affairs, courts, technology, and more—curated with context and built for readers who want clarity over noise.
[Explore Vera2]
Whether you’re interested in the creative process, want to engage with fellow readers, or simply want the latest updates, these resources are the best way to stay in touch with the world of The Unmaking of America—and with the broader news ecosystem at Vera2.
Free Chapter
Begin reading The Unmaking of America today and experience a story that asks: What remains when the rules are gone, and who will stand up when it matters most? Join the Fall of America mailing list below to receive the first chapter of The Unmaking of America for free and stay connected for updates, bonus material, and author news.