Everyone has an opinion on tools. It’s easy to get caught up in arguing about them, but much harder to openly talk about the true goal of the work. In the what vs how in creative work, the “what” is the goal—a system that works, a story worth reading. The “how” is the route you take to get there.
When the method changes, some react as if the goal has too. It hasn’t—the route is different, but the destination remains the same.
What vs How — The Goal vs the Method
A programmer at 3 a.m. is staring at a green dashboard while their phone buzzes with another on-call alert. His “what” is clear: keep the system alive. The “how” used to be hand-built scripts and a quick prayer. Now, it’s code generators and predictive monitoring. He still has to decide if the fix is right, take responsibility for deploying it, and live with the outcome.
A reporter waits outside a courthouse door, notebook ready. Her “what” is to tell the truth in a way that stands up to fact-checking, legal challenge, and the court of public opinion. The “how” once meant a blank page and a looming deadline. Now a draft can appear from a prompt before she finishes her coffee. She still has to decide which facts to trust, what to cut or keep, and how to write it so the story holds up under scrutiny.
Different industries, same what vs how in creative work challenge: the goal hasn’t changed, but the method is shifting fast.
Programmers: When the “How” Keeps Changing
In the past, programming required close attention to every detail. Memory and processing power were limited, so developers wrote code with efficiency in mind. Over time, tools evolved—first libraries, then cloud platforms, and now code generation.
The work has shifted, not disappeared. There’s less focus on repetitive setup and more on defining system boundaries, ensuring security, and making sound architectural choices. It can be frustrating to watch a model produce a functioning draft in seconds, but deciding whether that code is correct, safe to deploy, and fit for long-term use is still a human responsibility. That’s where the what vs how in creative work truly plays out.
Writers: The Louder Shake-Up
Writing went from typewriters to word processors, from print gatekeepers to blogs, and now to instant drafts from AI tools. Some writers love the speed; others resent seeing their voice reflected back without permission.
Here’s the constant: judgment. Choosing which scene matters. Spotting a number that feels wrong. Following up on a quote because the tone doesn’t match the transcript. That part of the what vs how in creative work equation is still entirely human.
Different Fears, Same Pressure
In IT, job loss is measurable. Replace two juniors with one senior plus automation, and the budget savings are obvious. Cuts can happen overnight.
For writers, the threat is slower. Cheap, endless text floods feeds, but attention doesn’t scale. Reputation erodes before payroll does. Both groups feel the hit when the “how” gets cheaper. It’s not vanity—it’s a sign the market is losing sight of the skill behind the work. And in both cases, the what vs how in creative work question becomes urgent: is the real value in the process, or the outcome?
What Stays Human in Creative Work
Some moments can’t be automated. The developer who ships a fix before the postmortem. The editor who cuts a beautiful but misleading paragraph. The reporter who writes a line she can defend in court and to her readers. These judgment calls define the what vs how in creative work far more than the method ever could.
Lessons Each Community Can Borrow
-
Programmers can borrow from writers: focus on the human at the other end. A nurse on the night shift cares about truth under pressure, not API elegance.
-
Writers can borrow from engineers: keep a changelog, source lists, and show your corrections. Transparency builds trust.
Mastery Moves When the “How” Changes
When tools make the “how” faster, skill becomes more visible in the choices that follow. Treat generators like fast interns: they can help, but the final call is yours. That’s where the what vs how in creative work is decided—and where your name, and your responsibility, live.
Staying Relevant When the Floor Moves
Own the problem, not just the task. Programmers should work closer to the domains where decisions have real-world impact. Writers should go where no AI can—into lived experience, direct quotes, and sources that trust them. The what vs how in creative work demands context, trust, and judgment.
The Goal Never Changes, Only the Method Does
Some jobs will evolve. A few will vanish. That’s happened before, from typesetters to cloud architects. The answer isn’t to ban or worship tools—it’s to keep the “what” clear and let the “how” adapt.
Programmers serve people who rely on alarms that must mean something. Writers serve readers who need words that don’t bend when it matters. That’s the heart of the what vs how in creative work—the goal stays the same, even when the route changes.
Further Reading
“Clients are increasingly looking for unique, human creativity…” – A Freelancer Fast 50 index shows rising demand for human-generated creative work, even amid AI saturation.
https://www.techradar.com/pro/clients-are-increasingly-looking-for-unique-human-creativity-research-finds-demand-for-creative-freelancers-is-surging-despite-ai-going-mainstream
“Will devs lose their jobs to AI?” – An overview of developers’ concerns around AI replacing junior roles and eroding trust in AI-generated code.
https://www.itpro.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/will-devs-lose-their-jobs-to-ai
“More than a quarter of computer-programming jobs just vanished.” – The Washington Post reports over 27% of U.S. programming jobs were lost recently, largely due to AI automation of routine tasks.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/03/14/programming-jobs-lost-artificial-intelligence
“From bootcamp to bust…” – A Reuters story tracing the collapse of coding bootcamp outcomes as AI tools undercut entry-level job prospects.
https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/bootcamp-bust-how-ai-is-upending-software-development-industry-2025-08-09
“AI is already taking video game illustrators’ jobs in China.” – Highlights the broader trend of middle-class jobs, including creators, being disrupted by generative AI.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence
“An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models” – An academic study estimating how much of U.S. work tasks—across 80% of workers—could be affected by LLMs.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130
Connect with the Author
Curious about the inspiration behind The Unmaking of America or want to follow the latest news and insights from J.T. Mercer? Dive deeper and stay connected through the links below:
-
About the Author
Discover more about J.T. Mercer’s background, writing journey, and the real-world events that inspired The Unmaking of America. Learn what drives the storytelling and how this trilogy came to life. -
NRP Dispatch Blog
Stay informed with the NRP Dispatch blog, where you’ll find author updates, behind-the-scenes commentary, and thought-provoking articles on current events, democracy, and the writing process.
Whether you’re interested in the creative process, want to engage with fellow readers, or simply want the latest updates, these resources are the best way to stay in touch with the world of The Unmaking of America and beyond.
